Liberal Democrats Alternative Budget 2001
| Matthew Taylor MP, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer | |
| Freedom to Live: Health | |
| Freedom to Learn: Education | |
| Freedom from Poverty: Pensions & Benefits | |
| Freedom from Crime: Law & Order | |
| Freedom to Travel: Transport | |
| Freedom for Enterprise: Business | |
| Freedom of Expression: Culture & Sport | |
| Freedom for Communities: Rural Affairs | |
| Freedom Abroad: Overseas Aid | |
| Appendix 1: Notes on Current Taxation and Spending | |
| Appendix 2: Summary of Main Tax and Spending Changes in Alternative Budget | |
| This document contains the priorities of the Federal Liberal Democrats, except in appropriate areas where the national policy of the Scottish and Welsh Liberal Democrats takes precedence. Figures presented are calculated on a UK-wide basis, recognising that there may be different priorities in devolved parts of the UK. This Alternative Budget is drawn up on the basis of official figures published by the Government in the November 2000 Pre-Budget Report and subsequently. It sets out our major priorities. All our commitments will be reviewed in the light of the revised figures published by the Chancellor in his March 2001 Budget, so that we can develop our proposals further in the light of the new figures for our general election manifesto. In addition, many of the policy papers published by the Liberal Democrats imply further modifications to existing government public expenditure priorities. We recognise that it may not be possible to achieve all these proposals in the lifetime of one Parliament, let alone one Budget. We will publish a full manifesto, with costings, at the time of the next general election. |
Introduction by Matthew Taylor MP Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
The Macro-economic Background to the Budget
While growth continues and the public finances are buoyant, Britain’s economy continues to be unbalanced. While the consumer sector is buoyant, other sectors such as manufacturing, tourism and agriculture are weak. Given the uncertainty in the world economy, including oil price rises, slowdown in the USA and continuing recession in Japan, these economic imbalances leave Britain in a vulnerable position.
Domestic Demand
Consumer demand continues to be buoyant and confidence is strong. The labour market continues to be reasonably strong despite the weakening of employment growth in recent months. Combined with the planned increases in public sector spending this year this provides reasonably strong domestic demand. However other sectors of the economy are weaker. Investment continues to be weak. Whole economy investment fell 0.5% in the third quarter of 2000, and the average return on capital has halved since 1998. Weak investment has continued to be a phenomenon of both the private sector and the public sector.
International Outlook
Export growth has been surprisingly strong but the uncertainty in the world economy, including oil price rises, slowdown in the USA and continuing recession in Japan may worsen net trade. While the pound has weakened in recent months it is still at historically high levels and has recently risen against the dollar. Imports continue to outstrip exports making a negative contribution to growth.
Summary of Economic Prospects
The manufacturing and farming sectors have been particularly badly hit by the high pound. Britain’s real short-term interest rates are also still more than double the level of those in the rest of Western Europe – at around 5% versus 2%, damaging Britain’s exporting industries and costing mortgage payers on average around a £1000 a year more. While the pound is somewhat lower than a year ago its high level against the Euro is still a major problem for British exporters and those facing imported competition. The evidence is mounting that Britain’s manufacturing sector is struggling as a direct consequence of the high exchange rate and interest rates. The recent job losses at Corus and the slimming down of British sourced components at Nissan are only the high profile results of these problems. Business investment growth is stagnant and Britain’s export performance has been weaker than expected given the revival of growth in the Euro zone. Manufacturing employment has fallen by over 200,000 since the last election. Manufacturing output growth outside the high technology sectors has been close to zero since 1996. This is causing both short-term pain to regions particularly dependent on exports, and longer-term problems to British industry through low investment. In short, Britain’s economic imbalances between consumption and investment continue to be a problem despite a buoyant economy.
The Euro
That is why we have accepted the report of our Expert Commission on the Euro that suggests an entry rate to the Euro of €1.25-€1.45 to the Pound, compared to the current level of around €1.58 : £1. An overvaluation of 15% still leaves us some way until we are ready to join the Euro. The Government could help to achieve this by making its exchange rate targets for joining the Euro clear, but it also needs to ensure the exchange rate is taken into account in its policy setting.
Fiscal Policy
For all these reasons, we believe that this year’s Budget should be broadly fiscally neutral to avoid forcing up interest rates and pushing up the pound still further. That means no big tax give-aways, which would only stoke consumer demand and worsen the economic imbalances presently being experienced. The Chancellor therefore has to make a choice in his budget between his planned tax cuts and early investment in public services. Our choice is clear and unequivocal – investment in schools, hospitals and pensions, before tax cuts. The Liberal Democrats were the only party to propose independence for the Bank of England at the last election. Labour adopted our proposal, but we would go further. In future, to stimulate a more considered debate on this key macro-economic issue of a trade-off between monetary and fiscal policy, we would require the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee to publish 60 days before the Budget each year a ‘Fiscal Assessment’. This would set out the present impact of fiscal policy on interest rates and the anticipated effect over the year ahead, on existing plans and likely alternative options. We would also make members of the Monetary Policy Committee more independent by giving them non-renewable terms, and seek appointments more representative of the UK as a whole. We will also make the appointments system more open and transparent.
A Green Economy
We would publish a full ‘Green Book’ at the time of the budget assessing its sustainable environmental impact. But longer term changes are also necessary. We regard it as essential to make a major shift in taxation from ‘goods’ like wealth creation which benefit Britain to ‘bads’ which are harmful like pollution. We also want to support green technology and environmental sunrise industries. We will establish a standing Green Tax Commission to make clear recommendations on reforming the tax system, observing the principle that increases in environmental taxes should be offset by tax cuts elsewhere. Green taxation will involve taxing differently, not taxing more.
No Stealth Taxes
Our policies are guaranteed because we explain exactly how they will be funded. Unlike the other parties we will not pretend you can get something for nothing, and they should not pretend you can cut taxes without cutting public services. In this Alternative Budget we explain exactly what we will do and what it will cost. Each year in Government we will send every tax payer a Citizens Tax Contract – a simple explanation of what people are paying in tax, any tax changes introduced by the government that year, why, and what they are spent on. This means that the Liberal Democrats can now be the first British political Party to guarantee that in the next Parliament there will be no new stealth taxes.
Cutting Tax on Incomes
Whilst our first priority is to invest in education, health and pensions, we have made it clear that as resources allow we would also wish to reform the tax system to reduce the tax burden on the low paid, and take those on the lowest incomes out of tax altogether. We would do this by replacing the 10p tax band with a zero rate. This would mean that 1.5million people would be taken out of income tax altogether, and income tax on others on low incomes would be cut. Our 1p on the basic rate of income tax would therefore only raise peoples tax when they earn more than average (£22,000 a year). This would also simplify the tax system. Prior to the Budget, it is impossible to be certain of the amount that the Chancellor has available to him. The IFS however estimate that he will have £3 billion to £4 billion to allocate, in which case it would be possible to fulfil this policy this year, in addition to the spending pledges outlined in this Alternative Budget which are fully funded by the tax changes we propose.
OUR GUARANTEE
This alternative Budget makes clear the Liberal Democrat priorities. More doctors, nurses, and beds to sort out the rationing and long waits in the NHS. More teachers, books and equipment, and an end to tuition fees, to give Britain world class education standards. We also want higher pensions, especially for older pensioners, to guarantee a decent old age, and reduce means testing - and more police on the beat, to improve everybody’s security and tackle crime. This cannot be done for free – but it is affordable. Just 1p on the basic rate for all but the richest 1% of taxpayers, who will pay a little more, will cost typical taxpayers just £2 a week – but put all those small amounts together, and we can transform the lives of people in Britain. That is why Liberal Democrats alone can guarantee to transform for good, hospitals, schools, pensions and security. We believe these are the priorities people want, and look forward to putting them to the British people.
The Liberal Democrat Alternative Budget will provide extra money for health. We will fund this from part of the revenue from a new top tax rate of 50p on income over £100,000, and by closing loopholes in capital gains tax. This will allow us to make significant improvements to the NHS. Our proposals to do this include:
The Liberal Democrat Alternative Budget will provide an extra £3 billion per year for education. Our plans for this extra revenue include:
Freedom from Poverty: Pensions & Benefits
The Liberal Democrat Alternative Budget will enable us to:
Freedom from Crime: Law & Order
The Liberal Democrat Alternative Budget will enable us to:
The Liberal Democrat Alternative Budget will:
Freedom for Enterprise: Business
The Liberal Democrat Alternative Budget will:
Freedom of Expression: Culture & Sport
The Liberal Democrat Alternative Budget will enable us to:
Freedom for Communities: Rural Affairs
The Liberal Democrat Alternative Budget will enable us to:
The Liberal Democrat Alternative Budget will enable us to:
Notes on Current Taxation and Spending
1. Taxation
Under any reasonable definition taxation has risen. While much of this rise is cyclical some is due to implementation of duty escalators. On the government’s own figures in 2000 taxes will be 40% of GDP compared to 38% in 1997. However, this has been to eliminate the Conservative deficit, not to raise spending.
2. Borrowing
So borrowing on any definition has dramatically dropped compared to 1997 – a deficit on the current budget in 1997 has turned into a sustained surplus – averaging more than 1% of GDP.
3. Spending
The dramatic fall in borrowing has only been achieved by an unprecedented squeeze on spending, as well as increased taxes. Under Labour spending has undershot the spending plans that Ken Clarke called ‘eye wateringly tight’. Spending as a proportion of national income has dropped so much that:
Summary of Main Tax and Spending Changes in the Alternative Budget
| Policy | Year 1, 2001-2002 | Year 2, 2002-2003 |
| Health | £400m | £1.6b |
| Education | £2.5b | £3b |
| Pensions | £2.7b | £2.8b |
| Police | £30m | £130m |
| Transport | £100m | £250m |
| Tackling Poverty | £210m | £550m |
| Farming | ---- | £10m |
| Arts/Culture | ---- | £10m |
| R&D | £240m | £240m |
| Overseas Aid | ---- | £50m |
| Total Expenditure | £6.18b | £8.64b |
| Tax Change | ||
| 1p on £ income tax | -£2.5b | -£3b |
| 50% rate above £100,000 | -£3.4b | -£3.7b |
| Capital Gains Tax changes | ---- | -£1.2b |
| Savings | ||
| Export Credit Guarantees | -£240m | -£240m |
| Drugs Bill | ---- | -£220m |
| Housing Benefits Fraud | -£40m | -£280m |
| Total Tax/Savings | -£6.18b | -£8.64b |
It is impossible before the Budget to be certain about the resources now available to the Chancellor. However, it is expected he may have substantial funds available. If so, in addition to the plans outlined above, we could begin to implement our long-term aim of cutting the tax burden on those below average earnings by cutting the 10p rate to zero. For example: Estimated size of Chancellor’s Surplus: £3-4b (Institute for Fiscal Studies, Jan. 2001)
Cost of cutting 10p tax rate to zero: £4b (Tax Ready Reckoner, HM Treasury, Nov. 2000)